differing language registers for Psalm 2

In the 1852 translation of the Psalms into Javanese by Johann F.C. Gericke, the translator attempted to highlight the different voices and sections of the psalm by using different language styles or sociolects of Javanese. Ngoko , a “top-down” register, was used when senior people communicated to people junior in age or rank, and kromo , a “bottom-up” and more ornate register, was used to address superiors and elders. According to Gericke (quoted in Solleveld, cited below) “If one sought to use one and the same language in the entire Psalm, no Javanese would understand it. The difference between Kromo and Ngoko is often as big as between Dutch and Polish.”

  • In verse 1 and 2, the psalmist uses kromo
  • In verse 3, the enemies of the king in Zion and rebels use ngoko
  • In verse 4 and 5, the pslamist again uses kromo
  • In verse 6, God himself is quoted in ngoko, but in a style differing from that of the rebels
  • In the first half of verse 7, the anointed king speaks kromo
  • From the second half of verse 7 and verses 8 and 9, containing the words of the Lord to his Anointed One, ngoko is used again
  • In verses 10, 11, and 12, the psalmist uses kromo in his admonition to the rebels.

(Source: Floris Solleveld in A Tale of Two Translators from the Global Bible project)

Source for Javanese language registers and the different sections of Psalm 2.

gentiles / nations

The Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Latin that is often translated as “gentiles” (or “nations”) in English is often translated as a “local equivalent of ‘foreigners,'” such as “the people of other lands” (Guerrero Amuzgo), “people of other towns” (Tzeltal), “people of other languages” (San Miguel El Grande Mixtec), “strange peoples” (Navajo (Dinė)) (this and above, see Bratcher / Nida), “outsiders” (Ekari), “people of foreign lands” (Kannada), “non-Jews” (North Alaskan Inupiatun), “people being-in-darkness” (a figurative expression for people lacking cultural or religious insight) (Toraja-Sa’dan) (source for this and three above Reiling / Swellengrebel), “from different places all people” (Martu Wangka) (source: Carl Gross).

Tzeltal translates it as “people in all different towns,” Chicahuaxtla Triqui as “the people who live all over the world,” Highland Totonac as “all the outsider people,” Sayula Popoluca as “(people) in every land” (source: Waterhouse / Parrott in Notes on Translation October 1967, p. 1ff.), Chichimeca-Jonaz as “foreign people who are not Jews,” Sierra de Juárez Zapotec as “people of other nations” (source of this and one above: Viola Waterhouse in Notes on Translation August 1966, p. 86ff.), Highland Totonac as “outsider people” (source: Waterhouse / Parrott in Notes on Translation October 1967, p. 1ff.), Uma as “people who are not the descendants of Israel” (source: Uma Back Translation), “other ethnic groups” (source: Newari Back Translation), and Yakan as “the other tribes” (source: Yakan Back Translation).

In Chichewa, it is translated with mitundu or “races.” (Source: Mawu a Mulungu mu Chichewa Chalero Back Translation)

See also nations.

complete verse (Psalm 2:1)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Psalm 2:1:

  • Chichewa Mawu a Mulungu mu Chichewa Chalero translation, 2002/2016:
    “Why do people of other races want to do a conspiracy?
    Why are the people plotting worthless things?” (Source: Chichewa Back Translation)
  • Newari:
    “Why do the nations keep on conspiring?
    Why do people go on setting needless traps?” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
  • Hiligaynon:
    “Why do nations plan evil?
    Why do they plan of no value?” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
  • Eastern Bru:
    “Why do all the people in the countries of the world look for ways to accuse/blame? Why do they discuss ideas/ways that have no meaning/results?” (Source: Bru Back Translation)
  • Laarim:
    “Why do the nations plot bad matters
    and people plot bad matters,
    that they do not have the power to do it?” (Source: Laarim Back Translation)
  • Nyakyusa-Ngonde (back-translation into Swahili):
    “Kwa nini makabila yanasemezana kumwasi Mungu,
    tena nchi zinawaza ya ovyo?” (Source: Nyakyusa Back Translation)
  • English:
    “Why do the leaders of nations rage against God?/ It is foolish for the nations to be angry with God.
    Why do people plan to rebel against God even though it is in vain?/ It is useless for people to plan to rebel against God!” (Source: Translation for Translators)

Translation commentary on Psalm 2:1

The two lines of this verse are parallel and are in the form of a question, to show how foolish and useless are the rebellion and the plots being planned against Yahweh and his chosen king. The second line repeats the first one, adding the affirmation that the plots will not succeed. The question is not a request for information but is a way of expressing contempt and astonishment at the attempt of Israel’s enemies to defeat Israel’s king. “How dare the nations plan rebellion?” Or, as a statement, “It is completely useless for the nations to plan rebellion.” The French common language version (Bible en français courant) uses a question and a statement: “The nations are in an uproar–but why? The peoples plot, but it is useless!”

It is not necessary to have two different words in translation to represent the nations and the peoples, since the two refer to the same group. In the context of this psalm, these are Gentile nations, who were considered pagans (Biblia Dios Habla Hoy translates “Why are the pagan peoples in turmoil? Why do they…?”).

In some languages there is no term for “nation” as a large, independent political unit. The largest political group may be called a “tribe.” It is sometimes unnatural to say that tribes are planning rebellions, and so one must speak of the leaders of the tribes rebelling. It may also be necessary to indicate against whom the people are conspiring. Hence, “Why do the chiefs of the foreign tribes conspire against God and his people?”

Conspire translates a verb found only here in the Old Testament; it is variously defined: “rage” (An American Translation, New American Bible [New American Bible]), “uproar” (New Jerusalem Bible, Bible en français courant), “assemble,” and Briggs has “consult together.” It would seem that a meaning such as conspire (or Good News Translation “plan rebellion”) more readily fits the context, as a closer parallel to the verb in line b.

The verb translated plot is the same that in 1.2 is translated “meditates”; here it is a whispering, a murmuring, of conspirators. And the phrase in vain means “without success,” “useless” (Good News Translation). New Jerusalem Bible has “impotent muttering.”

In these two parallel lines only the second contains in vain. Although it is true that conspiring in line a is equally useless, the addition of in vain in the second line serves to heighten the element of failure in relation to the verbs of both lines. It is not implied that the nations conspire with some degree of success, and that only the peoples fail in their plotting. If the translation gives this impression, the translator is advised to make clear that what is done in both lines is without success.

It may not be possible in some languages to maintain the parallelism of the two clauses; and in these cases they may have to be reduced to one; for example, “Why do the leaders of the foreign tribes plot against God and his chosen king? Their plotting will fail,” or as a statement, “The chiefs of the pagan tribes conspire against God and his chosen leader, but they will not succeed.”

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Reyburn, William D. A Handbook on the Book of Psalms. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 1991. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Psalm 2: Layer by Layer

The following are presentations by the Psalms: Layer by Layer project, run by Scriptura . The first is an overview and the second an introduction into the poetry of Psalm 2.


Copyright © Scriptura


Copyright © Scriptura

The overview in French (click or tap here to view the video):


Copyright © Scriptura

The overview in Russian (click or tap here to view the video):


Copyright © Scriptura

Psalm 2 as classical Chinese poetry

John Wu Ching-hsiung (1899-1986) was a native of Ningbo, Zhejiang, a renowned jurist who studied in Europe and the United States, and served as a professor of law at Soochow University, as a judge and the Acting President of the Shanghai Provisional Court, and as the Vice President of the Commission for the Drafting of the Constitution of the Republic of China, before becoming the Minister of the Republic of China to the Holy See. Wu has written extensively, not only on law but also on Chinese philosophy, and has also written his autobiography, Beyond East and West, in English. Wu was a devout Catholic and had a personal relationship with Chiang Kai-shek (1887-1975). Wu began translating the the Psalms in 1938, and was encouraged by Chiang to translate the entire New Testament, which he corrected in his own handwriting. (…) John Wu Ching-hsiung’s translation of the Psalms (first draft in 1946, revised in 1975) was translated into Literary Chinese in the form of poetic rhyme, with attention paid to the style of writing. According to the content and mood of the different chapters of the original psalm, Wu chose Chinese poetic forms such as tetrameter, pentameter, heptameter [4, 5 or 7 syllables/Chinese characters per stanza], and the [less formal] Sao style, and sometimes more than two poetic forms were used in a single poem. (Source: Simon Wong)

John Wu Ching-hsiung himself talks about his celebrated and much-admired (though difficult-to-understand) translation in his aforementioned autobiography: (Click or tap here to see)

“Nothing could have been farther from my mind than to translate the Bible or any parts of it with a view to publishing it as an authorized version. I had rendered some of the Psalms into Chinese verse, but that was done as a part of my private devotion and as a literary hobby. When I was in Hongkong in 1938, I had come to know Madame H. H. Kung [Soong Ai-ling], and as she was deeply interested in the Bible, I gave her about a dozen pieces of my amateurish work just for her own enjoyment. What was my surprise when, the next time I saw her, she told me, “My sister [Soong Mei-ling] has written to say that the Generalissimo [Chiang Kai-shek] likes your translation of the Psalms very much, especially the first, the fifteenth, and the twenty-third, the Psalm of the Good Shepherd!”

“In the Autumn of 1940, when I was in Chungking, the Generalissimo invited me several times to lunch with him and expressed his appreciation of the few pieces that he had read. So I sent him some more. A few days later I received a letter from Madame Chiang [Soong Mei-ling], dated September 21, 1940, in which she said that they both liked my translation of the few Psalms I had sent them. ‘For many years,’ she wrote, ‘the Generalissimo has been wanting to have a really adequate and readable Wen-li (literary) translation of the Bible. He has never been able to find anyone who could undertake the matter.’ The letter ends up by saying that I should take up the job and that ‘the Generalissimo would gladly finance the undertaking of this work.’

“After some preliminary study of the commentaries, I started my work with the Psalms on January 6, 1943, the Feast of the Epiphany.

“I had three thousand years of Chinese literature to draw upon. The Chinese vocabulary for describing the beauties of nature is so rich that I seldom failed to find a word, a phrase, and sometimes even a whole line to fit the scene. But what makes such Psalms so unique is that they bring an intimate knowledge of the Creator to bear upon a loving observation of things of nature. I think one of the reasons why my translation is so well received by the Chinese scholars is that I have made the Psalms read like native poems written by a Chinese, who happens to be a Christian. Thus to my countrymen they are at once familiar and new — not so familiar as to be jejune, and not so new as to be bizarre. I did not publish it as a literal translation, but only as a paraphrase.

“To my greatest surprise, [my translation of the Psalms] sold like hot dogs. The popularity of that work was beyond my fondest dreams. Numberless papers and periodicals, irrespective of religion, published reviews too good to be true. I was very much tickled when I saw the opening verse of the first Psalm used as a headline on the front page of one of the non-religious dailies.”


A contemporary researcher (Lindblom 2021) mentions this about Wu’s translation: “Wu created a unique and personal work of sacred art that bears the imprint of his own admitted love and devotion, a landmark achievement comparable to Antoni Gaudi’s Basilica of the Sagrada Família in Barcelona, Spain. Although its use is still somewhat limited today, it continues to attract readers for the aforementioned qualities, and continues to be used in prayers and music by those who desire beauty and an authentic Chinese-sounding text that draws from China’s ancient traditions.”

The translation of Psalm 2 from the 1946 edition in the so-called Sao style (the 1946 edition did not have verse numbers either and underlined proper names):

順與逆

何列邦之擾攘兮。何萬民之猖狂。 世酋蠭起兮。跋扈飛揚。共圖背叛天主兮。反抗受命之王。 曰吾儕豈長甘羈絆兮。盍解其縛而脫其繮。
在天者必大笑兮。笑蜉蝣之不知自量。 終必勃然而怒兮。以懲當車之螳螂。 主曰吾已立君於西溫聖山之上兮。 君曰吾將宣聖旨於萬方。主曾告予兮。爾為予新得之元良。 予必應爾所求兮。如聲斯響。普天率土兮。莫非吾兒之宇疆。 爾當執鐵杖以粉碎群逆兮。有如瓦缶與壺觴。
嗚呼世之侯王兮。盍不及早省悟。鳴呼世之法吏兮。盍不自守法度。 小心翼翼以事主兮。寓歡樂於敬懼。 心悅誠服以順命兮。免天帝之震怒。何苦自取滅亡兮。自絕於康莊之大路。須知惟有委順兮。能邀無窮之福祚。

Transcription into Roman alphabet with the particle xī, that is characteristic for the Sao style, highlighted:

shùn yǔ nì

hé liè bāng zhī rǎo rǎng 。 hé wàn mín zhī chāng kuáng 。 shì qiú fēng qǐ 。 bá hù fēi yáng 。 gòng tú bèi pàn tiān zhǔ 。 fǎn kàng shòu mìng zhī wáng 。 yuē wú chái qǐ cháng gān jī bàn 。 hé jiě qí fù ér tuō qí jiāng 。
zài tiān zhě bì dà xiào 。 xiào fú yóu zhī bù zhī zì liáng 。 zhōng bì bó rán ér nù 。 yǐ chěng dāng chē zhī táng láng 。 zhǔ yuē wú yǐ lì jūn yú xī wēn shèng shān zhī shàng 。 jūn yuē wú jiāng xuān shèng zhǐ yú wàn fāng 。 zhǔ zēng gào yú 。 ěr wéi yú n dé zhī yuán liáng 。 yú bì yīng ěr suǒ qiú 。 rú shēng sī xiǎng 。 pǔ tiān shuài tǔ 。 mò fēi wú ér zhī yǔ jiāng 。 ěr dāng zhí tiě zhàng yǐ fěn suì qún nì 。 yǒu rú wǎ fǒu yǔ hú shāng 。
wū hū shì zhī hóu wáng 。 hé bù jí zǎo shěng wù 。 míng hū shì zhī fǎ lì 。 hé bù zì shǒu fǎ dù 。 xiǎo n yì yì yǐ shì zhǔ 。 yù huān lè yú jìng jù 。 xīn yuè chéng fú yǐ shùn mìng 。 miǎn tiān dì zhī zhèn nù 。 hé kǔ zì qǔ miè wáng 。 zì jué yú kāng zhuāng zhī dà lù 。 xū zhī wéi yǒu wěi shùn 。 néng yāo wú qióng zhī fú zuò 。

With thanks to Simon Wong.