Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Leviticus 11:1:

• Kupsabiny: “Then God said to Moses and Aaron,” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
• Newari: “The LORD spoke to Moses and Aaron.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
• Hiligaynon: “The LORD commanded Moises and Aaron to tell this to the Israelinhon:
  You (plur.) may eat any animal that lives on earth in-which their hooves are-divided/split and chews again their cud/food/what-they-ate” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
• English: “Yahweh said to Aaron and Moses/me,” (Source: Translation for Translators)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Leviticus 11:2:

• Kupsabiny: “‘Tell the people of Israel that among all the animals of the world which you (plur.) may eat are these:” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
• Newari: “Say to the Israelites, These are that beasts you can eat among all the beasts that live on the earth.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
• Hiligaynon: “The LORD commanded Moises and Aaron to tell this to the Israelinhon:
  You (plur.) may eat any animal that lives on earth in-which their hooves are-divided/split and chews again their cud/food/what-they-ate” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
• English: “‘Tell the Israeli people that this is what Yahweh says: From all the animals that live on the land, these are the ones that you are permitted to eat:” (Source: Translation for Translators)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Leviticus 11:3:

• Kupsabiny: “Any animal whose hooves are split and chews the cud.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
• Newari: “It is OK for you to eat animals [that have] split hoofs and that eat by chewing the cud.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
• Hiligaynon: “The LORD commanded Moises and Aaron to tell this to the Israelinhon:
  You (plur.) may eat any animal that lives on earth in-which their hooves are-divided/split and chews again their cud/food/what-they-ate” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
• English: “The ones that have hooves that are completely split and that chew their cuds/bring their food up from their stomachs to chew it again.” (Source: Translation for Translators)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Leviticus 11:4:

• Kupsabiny: “But there are some that chew the cud but the hooves are not divided or one whose hooves are divided but it does not chew the cud. Do not eat a camel because (it) chews the cud but the hooves are not divided. (It) is not clean as far as you are concerned.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
• Newari: “It is, however, not OK to eat animals that only chew the cud or that [have] only split hoofs. For instance, the camel — Although it chews the cud it does not have split hoofs. And for you it is unclean.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
• Hiligaynon: “But you (plur.) may- not -eat the animals which chews again their cud/food/what-they-ate but their hooves do-not-have splitting, just-like a camel and a rabbit. You (plur.) also may- not -eat the pig, for even-if its hoof is-split, it does- not -chew again its cud/what- it -ate. You (plur.) are-to-consider these animals dirty/unclean. You (plur.) are- not -to-eat their meat or even touch their dead bodies.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
• English: “There are some animals that chew their cuds but do not have split hooves, and some animals that have split hooves but do not chew their cuds. You must not eat any of those animals. For example, camels chew their cuds but do not have split hooves, so they are unacceptable for you to eat.” (Source: Translation for Translators)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Leviticus 11:5:

• Kupsabiny: “Do not eat a rock badger because (it) chews the cud but the hooves are not divided. It, too, is not clean as far as you are concerned.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
• Newari: “And the hyrax — Even though it chews the cud, it’s hoofs are not split. It is unclean for you.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
• Hiligaynon: “But you (plur.) may- not -eat the animals which chews again their cud/food/what-they-ate but their hooves do-not-have splitting, just-like a camel and a rabbit. You (plur.) also may- not -eat the pig, for even-if its hoof is-split, it does- not -chew again its cud/what- it -ate. You (plur.) are-to-consider these animals dirty/unclean. You (plur.) are- not -to-eat their meat or even touch their dead bodies.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
• English: “Rock badgers chew their cuds but do not have split hooves, so they are unacceptable for you to eat.” (Source: Translation for Translators)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Leviticus 11:6:

• Kupsabiny: “Do not eat a hare because (it) chews the cud but the hooves are not divided. It also is not clean as far as you are concerned.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
• Newari: “Like that, the hare — Even though it chews the cud, its hoofs are not split. For you it is unclean.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
• Hiligaynon: “But you (plur.) may- not -eat the animals which chews again their cud/food/what-they-ate but their hooves do-not-have splitting, just-like a camel and a rabbit. You (plur.) also may- not -eat the pig, for even-if its hoof is-split, it does- not -chew again its cud/what- it -ate. You (plur.) are-to-consider these animals dirty/unclean. You (plur.) are- not -to-eat their meat or even touch their dead bodies.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
• English: “Rabbits chew their cuds but do not have split hooves, so they are unacceptable for you to eat.” (Source: Translation for Translators)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Leviticus 11:7:

• Kupsabiny: “Also do not eat a (wild) pig because even though its hooves are divided, it does not chew the cud. It is not clean as far as you are concerned.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
• Newari: “Like that, it is not OK for you to eat the pig. For even though its hoofs are split, it does not chew the cud. So for you it is unclean.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
• Hiligaynon: “But you (plur.) may- not -eat the animals which chews again their cud/food/what-they-ate but their hooves do-not-have splitting, just-like a camel and a rabbit. You (plur.) also may- not -eat the pig, for even-if its hoof is-split, it does- not -chew again its cud/what- it -ate. You (plur.) are-to-consider these animals dirty/unclean. You (plur.) are- not -to-eat their meat or even touch their dead bodies.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
• English: “Pigs have completely split hooves but they do not chew their cuds, so they are unacceptable for you to eat.” (Source: Translation for Translators)