Inga uses the word Amalai (“Oh that it were . . .!”) to express a contrafactual wish. It is used in Romans 14:15: “Oh that it were to not let what you eat . . . ” (Source: S. Levinsohn in Journal of Translation 18/2022, p. 67ff. )
love (noun)
The Greek noun that is translated as “love” or “charity” in English is translated in Mandarin Chinese as àixīn (爱心 / 愛心), literally “loving heart.”
pain-love and love (Khanty).
brother (fellow believer)
The Greek that is translated in English as “brother” or “brother and sister” (in the sense of fellow believers), is translated with a specifically coined word in Kachin: “There are two terms for brother in Kachin. One is used to refer to a Christian brother. This term combines ‘older and younger brother.’ The other term is used specifically for addressing siblings. When one uses this term, one must specify if the older or younger person is involved. A parallel system exists for ‘sister’ as well. In [these verses], the term for ‘a Christian brother’ is used.” (Source: Gam Seng Shae)
In Matumbi is is translated as alongo aumini or “relative-believer.” (Source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific notes in Paratext)
In Martu Wangka it is translated as “relative” (this is also the term that is used for “follower.”) (Source: Carl Gross)
In the German New Testament translation by Berger / Nord (publ. 1999) it is often translated as Mitchristen or “fellow Christians.”
See also brothers.
complete verse (Romans 14:15)
Following are a number of back-translations of Romans 14:15:
- Uma: “So also, if for example I hurt the heart of a companion because I eat what that companion says is taboo/forbidden, I also have sinned, because I am not being loving to my companion. That’s why I say, take care not tempt companions with food with the result that his/her faith is destroyed. For those companions of ours are our relatives in the Lord, whom Christ redeemed by his death.” (Source: Uma Back Translation)
- Yakan: “If your (sing.) brother who trusts in Isa is worried/troubled because you eat something but/and-what’s-more it is unclean/forbidden to him, na that means it is clear that you (sing.) do not love him. If because of your (sing.) food perhaps eventually your brother no longer obeys/follows God, don’t then eat (it). Isa Almasi died hep because of that brother of yours (sing.).” (Source: Yakan Back Translation)
- Western Bukidnon Manobo: “And if you eat that which he thinks mistakenly was forbidden, this will upset him very greatly and it’s as if you have no kindness for him; and it’s not good if that person is successfully tempted by means of your eating, because he is your fellow believer and Christ allowed Himself to be killed as his substitute also.” (Source: Western Bukidnon Manobo Back Translation)
- Kankanaey: “We then who have no taboo foods, if our companion is offended/hurt (lit. his mind is pained) because of what we eat, it is not love that we show him. So let us be careful so we don’t destroy the faith of our companion because of mere food, because Cristo died for him.” (Source: Kankanaey Back Translation)
- Tenango Otomi: “Therefore if you really love your brother, then do not eat anything that will spoil your brother. Christ has died to save him. Do not cause his heart to be spoiled just because you want to eat something that tastes good.” (Source: Tenango Otomi Back Translation)
Christ, Messiah
The Greek Christos (Χρηστός) is typically transliterated when it appears together with Iésous (Ἰησοῦς) (Jesus). In English the transliteration is the Anglicized “Christ,” whereas in many other languages it is based on the Greek or Latin as “Kristus,” “Cristo,” or similar.
When used as a descriptive term in the New Testament — as it’s typically done in the gospels (with the possible exceptions of for instance John 1:17 and 17:3) — Christos is seen as the Greek translation of the Hebrew mashiaḥ (המשיח) (“anointed”). Accordingly, a transliteration of mashiaḥ is used, either as “Messiah” or based on the Greek or Latin as a form of “Messias.”
This transliteration is also used in the two instances where the Greek term Μεσσίας (Messias) is used in John 1:41 and 4:25.
In some languages and some translations, the term “Messiah” is supplemented with an explanation. Such as in the German Gute Nachricht with “the Messiah, the promised savior” (Wir haben den Messias gefunden, den versprochenen Retter) or in Muna with “Messiah, the Saving King” (Mesias, Omputo Fosalamatino) (source: René van den Berg).
In predominantly Muslim areas or for Bible translations for a Muslim target group, Christos is usually transliterated from the Arabic al-Masih (ٱلْمَسِيحِ) — “Messiah.” In most cases, this practice corresponds with languages that also use a form of the Arabic Isa (عيسى) for Jesus (see Jesus). There are some exceptions, though, including modern translations in Arabic which use Yasua (يَسُوعَ) (coming from the Aramaic Yēšūa’) alongside a transliteration of al-Masih, Hausa which uses Yesu but Almahisu, and some Fula languages (Adamawa Fulfulde, Nigerian Fulfulde, and Central-Eastern Niger Fulfulde) which also use a form of Iésous (Yeesu) but Almasiihu (or Almasiifu) for Christos.
In Indonesian, while most Bible translations had already used Yesus Kristus rather than Isa al Masih, three public holidays used to be described using the term Isa Al Masih. From 2024 on, the government is using Yesus Kristus in those holiday names instead (see this article in Christianity Today ).
Other solutions that are used by a number of languages include these:
- Dobel: “The important one that God had appointed to come” (source: Jock Hughes)
- Noongar: Keny Mammarap or “The One Man” (source: Warda-Kwabba Luke-Ang)
- Mairasi: “King of not dying for life all mashed out infinitely” (for “mashed out,” see salvation; source: Lloyd Peckham)
- Western Bukidnon Manobo: “One chosen by God to rule mankind” (source: Western Bukidnon Manobo Back Translation)
- Bacama: Ma Pwa a Ngɨltən: “The one God has chosen” (source: David Frank in this blog post )
- Binumarien: Anutuna: originally a term that was used for a man that was blessed by elders for a task by the laying on of hands (source: Desmond Oatridges, Holzhausen 1991, p. 49f.)
- Noongar: Keny Boolanga-Yira Waangki-Koorliny: “One God is Sending” (source: Warda-Kwabba Luke-Ang)
- Uab Meto: Neno Anan: “Son of heaven” P. Middelkoop explains: “The idea of heavenly power bestowed on a Timorese king is rendered in the title Neno Anan. It is based on the historical fact that chiefs in general came from overseas and they who come thence are believed to have come down from heaven, from the land beyond the sea, that means the sphere of God and the ghosts of the dead. The symbolical act of anointing has been made subservient to the revelation of an eternal truth and when the term Neno Anan is used as a translation thereof, it also is made subservient to a new revelation of God in Jesus Christ. The very fact that Jesus came from heaven makes this translation hit the mark.” (Source: P. Middelkoop in The Bible Translator 1953, p. 183ff. )
In Finnish Sign Language both “Christ” and “Messiah” are translated with a sign signifying “king.” (Source: Tarja Sandholm)
“Christ / Messiah” in Finnish Sign Language (source )
Law (2013, p. 97) writes about how the Ancient Greek Septuagint‘s translation of the Hebrew mashiah was used by the New Testament writers as a bridge between the Old and New Testaments (click or tap here to read more):
“Another important word in the New Testament that comes from the Septuagint is christos, ‘Christ.’ Christ is not part of the name of the man from Nazareth, as if ‘the Christs’ were written above the door of his family home. Rather, ‘Christ’ is an explicitly messianic title used by the writers of the New Testament who have learned this word from the Septuagint’s translation of the Hebrew mashiach, ‘anointed,’ which itself is often rendered in English as ‘Messiah.’ To be sure, one detects a messianic intent on the part of the Septuagint translator in some places. Amos 4:13 may have been one of these. In the Hebrew Bible, God ‘reveals his thoughts to mortals,’ but the Septuagint has ‘announcing his anointed to humans.’ A fine distinction must be made, however, between theology that was intended by the Septuagint translators and that developed by later Christian writers. In Amos 4:13 it is merely possible we have a messianic reading, but it is unquestionably the case that the New Testament writers exploit the Septuagint’s use of christos, in Amos and elsewhere, to messianic ends.”
Learn more on Bible Odyssey: Christ .
Japanese benefactives (-naide)
Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.
Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.
One way Japanese shows different degree of politeness is through the choice of a benefactive construction as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. Here, -naide (ないで) or “do not (for their sake)” is used in combination with kudasaru (くださる), a respectful form of the benefactive kureru (くれる). A benefactive reflects the good will of the giver or the gratitude of a recipient of the favor. To convey this connotation, English translation needs to employ a phrase such as “for me (my sake)” or “for you (your sake).”
(Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )
Japanese benefactives (shinde)
Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.
Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between. One way Japanese shows different degree of politeness is through the choice of a benefactive construction as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017.
Here, shinde (死んで) or “die” is used in combination with kudasaru (くださる), a respectful form of the benefactive kureru (くれる). A benefactive reflects the good will of the giver or the gratitude of a recipient of the favor. To convey this connotation, English translation needs to employ a phrase such as “for me (my sake)” or “for you (your sake).” (Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )
Translation commentary on Romans 14:15
This verse refers back to verse 13 and shows the result of causing one’s brother to stumble or fall. Because of something you eat is literally “because of food” (see King James Version “with thy meat”). This phrase can be misinterpreted as being some physical object which causes harm to a fellow believer. The real meaning here is, of course, “because you insist on eating certain things” or “because you insist that eating certain things is all right.”
Then you are longer acting from love is literally “you are no longer walking according to love.” The verb “to walk in” has the same force that it does in 6.4; 8.4; and 13.13. An American Translation* translates by “your life is not governed by love” and the New English Bible by “your conduct is no longer guided by love.” It may be difficult to translate the clause you are no longer acting from love. In some languages some rather important shifts in the semantic structure are required—for example, “what you are doing shows that you do not love him any longer.”
The verb translated ruin is a very strong verb and may have reference to eternal destruction. Actually it is not the food that you eat which ruins the man for whom Christ died, but it is the fact that you eat certain foods which causes such a person’s ruin. Accordingly, the last sentence of verse 15 may need to be restructured as “just because you eat certain foods, you must not allow that to ruin the man for whom Christ died” or even “… to destroy the person for whom Christ died.” However, as in so many contexts of this kind, it may be necessary to employ plurals throughout: “to ruin the people for whom Christ died.” Such a shift from singular to plural may apply to this entire chapter.
Quoted with permission from Newman, Barclay M. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on Paul’s Letter to the Romans. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1973. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.