The Greek that is translated in English as “righteousness” is translated in the Hausa Common Language Bible as gaskiya or “truth.” (Source: Andy Warren-Rothlin)
See also Translation commentary on Wisdom 1:1.
Ἀγαπήσατε δικαιοσύνην, οἱ κρίνοντες τὴν γῆν,
φρονήσατε περὶ τοῦ κυρίου ἐν ἀγαθότητι
καὶ ἐν ἁπλότητι καρδίας ζητήσατε αὐτόν.
Wisdom of Solomon 1
Exhortation to Uprightness
1Love righteousness, you rulers of the earth;
think of the Lord in goodness
and seek him with sincerity of heart,
The Greek that is translated in English as “righteousness” is translated in the Hausa Common Language Bible as gaskiya or “truth.” (Source: Andy Warren-Rothlin)
See also Translation commentary on Wisdom 1:1.
Following is a list of (back-) translations of various languages:
See also respectable, righteous, righteous (person), devout, and She is more in the right(eous) than I.
God transcends gender, but most languages are limited to grammatical gender expressed in pronouns. In the case of English, this is traditionally confined to “he” (or in the forms “his,” “him,” and “himself”), “she” (and “her,” “hers,” and “herself”), and “it” (and “its” and “itself”).
Modern Mandarin Chinese, however, offers another possibility. Here, the third-person singular pronoun is always pronounced the same (tā), but it is written differently according to its gender (他 is “he,” 她 is “she,” and 它/牠 is “it” and their respective derivative forms). In each of these characters, the first (or upper) part defines the gender (man, woman, or thing/animal), while the second element gives the clue to its pronunciation.
In 1930, after a full century with dozens of Chinese translations, Bible translator Wang Yuande (王元德) coined a new “godly” pronoun: 祂. Chinese readers immediately knew how to pronounce it: tā. But they also recognized that the first part of that character, signifying something spiritual, clarified that each person of the Trinity has no gender aside from being God.
While the most important Protestant and Catholic Chinese versions respectively have opted not to use 祂, some Bible translations do and it is widely used in hymnals and other Christian materials. Among the translations that use 祂 to refer to “God” were early versions of Lü Zhenzhong’s (呂振中) version (New Testament: 1946, complete Bible: 1970). R.P. Kramers (in The Bible Translator 1956, p. 152ff. ) explains why later versions of Lü’s translation did not continue with this practice: “This new way of writing ‘He,’ however, has created a minor problem of its own: must this polite form be used whenever Jesus is referred to? Lü follows the rule that, wherever Jesus is referred to as a human being, the normal tā (他) is written; where he is referred to as divine, especially after the ascension, the reverential tā (祂) is used.”
In that system one kind of pronoun is used for humans (male and female alike) and one for natural elements, non-liquid masses, and some spiritual entities (one other is used for large animals and another one for miscellaneous items). While in these languages the pronoun for spiritual entities used to be employed when referring to God, this has changed into the use of the human pronoun.
Lynell Zogbo (in The Bible Translator 1989, p. 401ff. ) explains in the following way: “From informal discussions with young Christians especially, it would appear that, at least for some people, the experience and/or concepts of Christianity are affecting the choice of pronoun for God. Some people explain that God is no longer ‘far away,’ but is somehow tangible and personal. For these speakers God has shifted over into the human category.”
In Kouya, God (the Father) and Jesus are referred to with the human pronoun ɔ, whereas the Holy Spirit is referred to with a non-human pronoun. (Northern Grebo and Western Krahn make a similar distinction.)
Eddie Arthur, a former Kouya Bible translation consultant, says the following: “We tried to insist that this shouldn’t happen, but the Kouya team members were insistent that the human pronoun for the Spirit would not work.”
In Burmese, the pronoun ko taw (ကိုယ်တော်) is used either as 2nd person (you) or 3rd person (he, him, his) reference. “This term clearly has its root in the religious language in Burmese. No ordinary persons are addressed or known by this pronoun because it is reserved for Buddhist monks, famous religious teachers, and in the case of Christianity, the Trinity.” (Source: Gam Seng Shae in The Bible Translator 2002, p. 202ff. )
In Thai, the pronoun phra`ong (พระองค์) is used, a gender-neutral pronoun which must refer to a previously introduced royal or divine being. Similarly, in Northern Khmer, which is spoken in Thailand, “an honorific divine pronoun” is used for the pronoun referring to the persons of the Trinity (source: David Thomas in The Bible Translator 1993, p. 445 ). In Urak Lawoi’, another language spoken in Thailand, the translation often uses tuhat (ตูฮัด) — “God” — ”as a divine pronoun where Thai has phra’ong even though it’s actually a noun.” (Source for Thai and Urak Lawoi’: Stephen Pattemore)
The English “Contemporary Torah” addresses the question of God and gendered pronouns by mostly avoiding pronouns in the first five books of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament (unless God is referred to as “lord,” “father,” “king,” or “warrior”). It does that by either using passive constructs (“He gave us” vs. “we were given”), by using the adjective “divine” or by using “God” rather than a pronoun.
Some Protestant and Orthodox English Bibles use a referential capitalized spelling when referring to the persons of the Trinity with “He,” “His,” “Him,” or “Himself.” This includes for instance the New American Standard Bible or The Orthodox New Testament, but most translations do not. Two other languages where this is also done (in most Bible translations) are the closely related Indonesian and Malay. In both languages this follows the language usage according to the Qur’an, which in turn predicts that usage (see Soesilo in The Bible Translator 1991, p. 442ff. and The Bible Translator 1997, p. 433ff. ).
See also first person pronoun referring to God.
Learn more on Bible Odyssey: Gender of God .
在现代汉语中,第三人称单数代词的读音都是一样的(tā),但是写法并不一样,取决于性别以及是否有生命,即男性为“他”,女性为“她”,动物、植物和无生命事物为“它”(在香港和台湾的汉语使用,动物则为“牠”)。这些字的部首偏旁表明了性别(男人、女人、动物、无生命事物),而另一偏旁通常旁提示发音。
到1930年为止,基督教新教《圣经》经过整整一百年的翻译已经拥有了十几个译本,当时的一位圣经翻译者王元德新造了一个“神圣的”代词“祂”,偏旁“礻”表示神明。一般汉语读者会立即知道这字的发音是tā,而这个偏旁表示属灵的事物,因此他们明白这个字指出,三位一体的所有位格都没有性别之分,而单单是上帝。
然而,最重要的新教圣经译本(1919年的《和合本》)和天主教圣经译本(1968年的《思高圣经》)都没有采用“祂”;虽然如此,许多其他的圣经译本采用了这个字,另外还广泛出现在赞美诗和其他基督信仰的书刊中。(资料来源:Zetzsche)
《吕振中译本》的几个早期版本也使用“祂”来指称“上帝”;这个译本的《新约》于1946年译成,整部《圣经》于1970年完成。克拉默斯(Kramers)指出:“‘他’的这种新写法(即‘祂’)产生了一个小问题,就是在指称耶稣的时候,是否一律使用这个敬语代词?《吕振中译本》遵循的原则是,在称呼耶稣这个人的时候,用一般的‘他’,而在称呼耶稣神性的时候,特别是升天之后的耶稣,则用尊称‘祂’。”
Translator: Simon Wong
The Hebrew adonai in the Old Testament typically refers to God. The shorter adon (and in two cases in the book of Daniel the Aramaic mare [מָרֵא]) is also used to refer to God but more often for concepts like “master,” “owner,” etc. In English Bible translations all of those are translated with “Lord” if they refer to God.
In English Old Testament translations, as in Old Testament translations in many other languages, the use of Lord (or an equivalent term in other languages) is not to be confused with Lord (or the equivalent term with a different typographical display for other languages). While the former translates adonai, adon and mare, the latter is a translation for the tetragrammaton (YHWH) or the Name of God. See tetragrammaton (YHWH) and the article by Andy Warren-Rothlin in Noss / Houser, p. 618ff. for more information.
In the New Testament, the Greek term kurios has at least four different kinds of use:
In the first and fourth case, it is also translated as “Lord” in English.
Most languages naturally don’t have one word that covers all these meanings. According to Bratcher / Nida, “the alternatives are usually (1) a term which is an honorific title of respect for a high-ranking person and (2) a word meaning ‘boss’, ‘master’, or ‘chief.’ (…) and on the whole it has generally seemed better to employ a word of the second category, in order to emphasize the immediate personal relationship, and then by context to build into the word the prestigeful character, since its very association with Jesus Christ will tend to accomplish this purpose.”
When looking at the following list of back-translations of the terms that translators in the different languages have used for both kurios and adonai to refer to God and Jesus respectively, it might be helpful for English readers to recall the etymology of the English “Lord.” While this term might have gained an exalted meaning in the understanding of many, it actually comes from hlaford or “loaf-ward,” referring to the lord of the castle who was the keeper of the bread (source: Rosin 1956, p. 121).
Following are some of the solutions that don’t rely on a different typographical display (see above):
We have come to rely on another term which emphasizes God’s essential nature as YHWH, namely jukurrarnu (see tetragrammaton (YHWH)). This word is built on the same root jukurr– as is jukurrpa, ‘dreaming.’ Its basic meaning is ‘timelessness’ and it is used to describe physical features of the land which are viewed as always being there. Some speakers view jukurrarnu in terms of ‘history.’ In all Genesis references to YHWH we have used Kaatu Jukurrarnu. In all Mark passages where kurios refers to God and not specifically to Christ we have also used Kaatu Jukurrarnu.
New Testament references to Christ as kurios are handled differently. At one stage we experimented with the term Watirirririrri which refers to a ceremonial boss of highest rank who has the authority to instigate ceremonies. While adequately conveying the sense of Christ’s authority, there remained potential negative connotations relating to Warlpiri ceremonial life of which we might be unaware.
Here it is that the Holy Spirit led us to make a chance discovery. Transcribing the personal testimony of the local Warlpiri pastor, I noticed that he described how ‘my Warlaljamarri called and embraced me (to the faith)’. Warlaljamarri is based on the root warlalja which means variously ‘family, possessions, belongingness’. A warlaljamarri is the ‘owner’ or ‘possessor’ of something. While previously being aware of the ‘ownership’ aspect of warlaljamarri, this was the first time I had heard it applied spontaneously and naturally in a fashion which did justice to the entire concept of ‘Lordship’. Thus references to Christ as kurios are now being handled by Warlaljamarri.” (Source: Stephen Swartz, The Bible Translator 1985, p. 415ff. )
Law (2013, p. 97) writes about how the Ancient Greek Septuagint‘s translation of the Hebrew adonai was used by the New Testament writers as a bridge between the Old and New Testaments: “Another case is the use of kurios referring to Jesus. For Yahweh (in English Bibles: ‘the Lord‘), the Septuagint uses kurios. Although the term kurios usually has to do with one’s authority over others, when the New Testament authors use this word from the Septuagint to refer to Jesus, they are making an extraordinary claim: Jesus of Nazareth is to be identified with Yahweh.”
See also Father / Lord.
Love righteousness: Both the noun and the verb present problems for translators. The noun translated righteousness may refer to the quality of personal goodness, to things that are right and proper, or to justice. Since the rulers called on here are literally called “judges,” “justice” is the proper sense for this word. Rulers were called on to judge people and their actions, to reward those in the right and punish those in the wrong. If they did this properly, they were administering “justice.” In some languages (and English is one of them), Love is a strange choice of a verb to go with “justice” or righteousness. The meaning is that the ruler should value justice above all other things, should take his duty to render justice more seriously than any other task, and should want to be remembered for his sense of justice. Translators could try “Make justice your goal,” “Be determined to always judge people fairly,” or even “Consider that justice is more important than all other things.”
You rulers of the earth is literally “you who judge the earth,” a phrase used in the Greek of Psa 2.10. It refers to rulers in general, whether kings, princes, chiefs, or local governors of any kind. Compare 6.1, where “kings” are addressed, and 6.21 with “monarchs.” The same people are in mind in all three references. (Having Solomon address the world’s rulers is a figure of speech; the author’s real audience is the Jewish people.) People today are accustomed to thinking of judges as distinct from rulers, but in ancient days rulers themselves functioned as judges. The ancient reader would have known this, but readers today may need to have this made clear, even at the cost of wordiness. Since the focus in this verse seems to be on rendering fair judgments, it may be better to emphasize the aspect of judging rather than ruling. We should think of a situation in which someone recognized by the community is called on to decide between two people and the cases they present, and where the decision of this person will be considered binding. (King Solomon, of course, was highly regarded for the wisdom of his legal judgments; see 1Kgs 3.16-28.)
Both Revised Standard Version and Good News Translation follow the Greek in placing this line, the address to the rulers, after the preceding clause. For some translators, however, it may be more natural to begin with this phrase. It may also prove helpful to insert some phrase such as “Listen to what I say.” The first phrase of the book, whatever it is, should be strong and command attention. An alternative model is “Listen to what I say, all of you everywhere that have the duty of serving as judges. Make justice your goal.”
Think of the Lord with uprightness: New Revised Standard Version is more literal with “think of the Lord in goodness.” The problem here is how to interpret the phrase “in goodness.” Good News Translation has “sincerely,” the New English Bible (New English Bible) “as is your duty,” and the Revised English Bible (Revised English Bible) “in the right way.” Any of these are possible, but none of them may be the real meaning. It is worth observing that the word translated “goodness” is a very rare word. In all of biblical literature it occurs only four times, three of them in this book. In each of these three occurrences the word refers to God’s goodness. In 12.22 it is used in a context strikingly like this one: “so that we may meditate upon thy goodness when we judge.” (The other usage is 7.26.) This suggests that the meaning here is “think of how fair the Lord is when he judges,” that is, think of how good and just God is when he judges. Lord (kurios in Greek) is the equivalent of the Hebrew word ʾadonay, which means “one who rules” or “master.” In some languages the word for Lord is also the word used to translate “chief” and so the word “God” is added to make it clear who is being referred to; for example, “the Chief God.” However, in some languages it will be better to simply use “God.”
And seek him with sincerity of heart: Good News Translation has translated the idea of “seek God” in various places as “pray to God,” “come to God,” and other expressions. Here an equivalent must be found that can be reflected in the translation of verse 2, which has “he is found” and “manifests himself.” One possibility might be “try to find his will with all sincerity” or “try, sincerely and honestly, to find out what God wants you to do [or, find out his will].” This is in keeping with the sense suggested for the preceding line.
The verse might be rendered:
• Hear what I have to say, all of you anywhere who have the duty of serving as judges: Make justice your goal. Think of how fair the Lord is when he judges, and try, sincerely and honestly, to find out what he wants you to do [or, his will].
Quoted with permission from Bullard, Roger A. and Hatton, Howard A. A Handbook on The Wisdom of Solomon. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 2004. For this and other handbooks for translators see here.
No comments yet.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.