Japanese benefactives (sukuidashite)

Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.

Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.

One way Japanese shows different degree of politeness is through the choice of a benefactive construction as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. Here, sukuidashite (救い出して) or “save/rescue” is used in combination with kudasaru (くださる), a respectful form of the benefactive kureru (くれる). A benefactive reflects the good will of the giver or the gratitude of a recipient of the favor. To convey this connotation, English translation needs to employ a phrase such as “for me (my sake)” or “for you (your sake).”

(Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )

Honorary "rare" construct denoting God (“come”)

Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.

Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.

One way Japanese shows different degree of politeness is through the usage of an honorific construction where the morpheme rare (られ) is affixed on the verb as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. This is particularly done with verbs that have God as the agent to show a deep sense of reverence. Here, ko-rare-ru (来られる) or “come” is used.

(Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )

Translation commentary on 1 Thessalonians 1:10

Paul introduces here, at the end of the first section, a theme which he will discuss in greater detail in 4.13–5.11, and which will be one of the two main subjects of his Second Letter to the Thessalonians. Paul is always anxious that the Thessalonian Christian should maintain a balance between the present and future dimensions of Christian experience. The link between the two is Jesus, whose name here (as in Hebrews 12.2) is in an emphatic position at the climax of a long sentence. Good News Translation reproduces the emphasis by repeating his Son (cf. Bible en français courant).

Son is one of the most important titles of Jesus in the New Testament. It expresses his uniquely close but dependent relationship with God, whom he was probably the first to address in prayer as “Abba.” Like most, if not all, human language about God and most titles of Christ, it involves a figurative extension of the central meaning of the word “son.” Because of its theological importance, the metaphor should, if possible, be maintained in translation. And since the concept of sonship is common to all cultures, it usually can be retained. However, connotations of youth and physical generation should be avoided.

In rendering to come from heaven, it is important to use a word which clearly indicates “the abode of God” rather than merely “sky.” In this context an appropriate equivalent in some languages is “to come from where God is.”

From death is literally “from the dead.” In Greek, as in English, raised is a common word used here with an uncommon meaning. In some languages, this meaning is normally translated by a different and more literary word. Bible en français courant maintains a common language level by translating “whom he has brought back from death to life” (cf. Barclay). It is important to be specific and clear in rendering whom he raised from death. It is “God” who “raised Jesus from death,” but only rarely can one render the phrase “raised from death” literally. An expression such as “caused to live again” may be necessary.

Rescues is a synonym of “saves,” but one which places greater emphasis on the negative aspect of liberation from some danger. There is no contradiction between the present rescues and the future reference of that is coming. In Greek rescues is a present participle which implies a process having duration, something which has begun but is still incomplete. In many languages rescues is best translated as “causes us to escape,” “releases us from,” or “causes us not to suffer because of.”

For the first time in this letter, us includes both senders and readers, as the context shows (see comments on v. 4).

It is important to note that it is his Son Jesus who is raised from death (that is, he is the object of God’s activity), but it is this same one who rescues us from God’s anger. The shift in agent must be clearly indicated in the receptor language.

God’s anger that is coming rightly expands a Greek phrase which literally means “the anger (or wrath) which is coming.” Jews reading Hebrew aloud refrained from pronouncing the name of God, and although Paul is writing Greek, he seems to be influenced here by Jewish usage. The use of the article “the” shows that Paul assumes his readers know to whose anger he is referring.

The problem in translating anger is that of expressing the idea of God’s permanent, total, and personal opposition to evil, without suggesting an outburst of bad temper. It is a particularly acute example of the difficulty of using human language about God (technically called “anthropomorphism”). The Greek word which Good News Translation translates anger is a common word, and it is also used to refer to human anger (for example in Ephesians 4.31). It corresponds to the even more “human” Old Testament metaphor of someone’s nose being inflamed against someone else an expression which is used freely in speaking both of God (Exodus 4.14) and of men (Genesis 30.2). The addition of that is coming shows that Paul is thinking of a final manifestation of God’s opposition to evil which is very close to the meaning of “judgment,” the term used here by New English Bible Die Bibel im heutigen Deutsch Phillips. Other, less satisfactory, translations are “vengeance” (Knox) and “punishment” (Biblia Dios Habla Hoy). The Greek word for anger does not in isolation have a future reference, but New English Bible interestingly takes the whole phrase closely together and translates “the terrors of judgment to come.”

It is difficult in some languages to find adequate terms to translate the expression God’s anger. The focus of meaning in this context is judgment, but it would be wrong simply to translate “rescues us from God’s judgment that is coming,” even though the Greek term does imply a measure of God’s opposition to sin and his anger because of it. In some languages the best equivalent seems to be “angry judgment.” Some persons would prefer a translation such as “who rescues us from God’s stern judgment.” Some recasting of this last clause may result in “who rescues us from the judgment that is going to come because God is so angry because of men’s sins,” or “… because God is so angrily opposed to men’s sins.” Yet there are other languages in which it is impossible to speak about a “judgment that is going to come,” because “judgment” is not thought of as something that can “come.” One can, however, speak about “judgment which is going to take place,” or “a will-be judging.” This fact may require a recasting of the last clause to read “who will rescue us when God is about to judge people, for he is angry because of their sins.”

Quoted with permission from Ellingworth, Paul and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on Paul’s First Letter to the Thessalonians. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1976. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

SIL Translator's Notes on 1 Thessalonians 1:10

1:10a

and to await His Son from heaven: This refers to the time when Jesus will return to earth. This is a theme in Paul’s letters to the Thessalonians. See 1 Thessalonians 3:13, 4:13–18, 5:1–3, and 2 Thessalonians 2:1–12 for further explanation.

to await: In this context this expression implies “expecting with certainty that Jesus will return.” Here is another way to translate this expression:

to wait expectantly (Revised English Bible)

His Son: The phrase His Son refers to God’s Son, Jesus. “The Son of God” or “God’s Son” is a title that was often used to refer to a savior who would be a descendant of King David. God would send this savior to rescue his people. This person was often referred to as the “Messiah” or “Christ.”

The title “the Son of God” also indicates that Jesus has the same nature and character as God. The relationship between God the Father and Jesus, his Son, is similar in some way to the relationship between human fathers and sons. But God the Father does not have a physical body. He did not have a sexual relationship with Mary that resulted in her becoming pregnant and giving birth to Jesus. The Son of God existed eternally as the Son with his Father.

In areas where people do not understand the title “the Son of God” in this way, you may want to include a footnote that explains the correct meaning. Here is a suggested footnote:

The title “his Son” or “the Son of God” refers to Jesus. It indicates that Jesus has the same nature and character as God. It does not mean that God the Father had a sexual relationship with Mary that resulted in her becoming pregnant and giving birth to Jesus. Mary became pregnant with Jesus in a miraculous way by the Holy Spirit of God.

In some languages, it is natural to speak of a son as a “child,” without specifying male or female. If that is true in your language, you may use a more general term, such as:

his Child (A translation of the title “the Son of God” must include a familial term such as “son” or “child.” Translations such as “the man who is God,” “the divine man,” or “the God man” are not acceptable, since they do not retain familial language. Examples of acceptable translation options include “the Son who comes from God” and “the divine/unique/eternal Son of God.”)

Other verses will usually make clear that Jesus was a male child. If you use a phrase such as “his male child,” be sure that it does not imply that God had another child who was female.

heaven: The word heaven refers to the place where God lives. Many languages use the same term for “sky” and for heaven.

1:10c

our deliverer: The Greek word that the Berean Standard Bible translates as deliverer is a present participle in Greek and therefore includes both the present and the future. Jesus is delivering his people now and he will deliver them in the future so that God will not punish them on the day when he judges all people.

from the coming wrath: This refers to God’s anger. Because God is holy, he is angry when people sin. Paul referred to this anger as coming because he was referring to the day when God will judge everyone. On that day God will show this anger and he will punish people who have sinned but have never repented and trusted in Jesus.

Paragraph 2:1–2

Paul reminded the Thessalonians about how he and his companions came to Thessalonica. Although people had persecuted them in Philippi and forced them to leave, God had helped them to have the courage to continue their journey to Thessalonica and preach the gospel there.

2:1

You yourselves know: In Greek, the word that the Berean Standard Bible translates as You yourselves is emphatic. The word You contrasts with “they themselves” in 1:9a. Not only were other people talking about Paul’s visit to Thessalonica, but the Thessalonians themselves knew what had happened.

brothers: See the note on 1:4.

our visit to you: The Greek word eisodos, which the Berean Standard Bible translates as visit here, is the same word that it translated as “welcome” in 1:9a. It is most logical to translate the word the same way in both places. Nearly all commentators and English versions agree that here it means visit.

was not in vain: Rather than simply saying “our visit to you was a success,” Paul chose to make his statement stronger by using two negatives: not and in vain. This sort of figure of speech is called “litotes.” Paul wanted to emphasize that his visit had definitely had a good result. When he had preached the gospel, it had resulted in the Thessalonians believing in Jesus Christ. Paul was referring to 1:9, which says that many Thessalonians had stopped worshiping idols and had begun to serve God.

If you do not use litotes in your language to strengthen a statement, you may need to restate this part of the verse positively. For example:

You know, brothers, that our visit to you was a great success.
-or-
You know, brothers, that when we visited you, there were great results.

© 2002 by SIL International®

Made available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA) creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

All Scripture quotations in this publication, unless otherwise indicated, are from The Holy Bible, Berean Standard Bible. BSB is produced in cooperation with Bible Hub, Discovery Bible, OpenBible.com, and the Berean Bible Translation Committee.