sin

The Hebrew and Greek that is typically translated as “sin” in English has a wide variety of translations.

The Greek ἁμαρτάνω (hamartanō) carries the original verbatim meaning of “miss the mark” and likewise, many translations contain the “connotation of moral responsibility.”

  • Loma: “leaving the road” (which “implies a definite standard, the transgression of which is sin”)
  • Navajo (Dinė): “that which is off to the side” (source for this and above: Bratcher / Nida)
  • Toraja-Sa’dan: kasalan, originally meaning “transgression of a religious or moral rule” and in the context of the Bible “transgression of God’s commandments” (source: H. van der Veen in The Bible Translator 1950, p. 21ff. )
  • Kaingang: “break God’s word”
  • Bariai: “bad behavior” (source: Bariai Back Translation)
  • Sandawe: “miss the mark” (like the original meaning of the Greek term) (source for this and above: Ursula Wiesemann in Holzhausen / Riderer 2010, p. 36ff., 43)

In Shipibo-Conibo the term is hocha. Nida (1952, p. 149) tells the story of its choosing: “In some instances a native expression for sin includes many connotations, and its full meaning must be completely understood before one ever attempts to use it. This was true, for example, of the term hocha first proposed by Shipibo-Conibo natives as an equivalent for ‘sin.’ The term seemed quite all right until one day the translator heard a girl say after having broken a little pottery jar that she was guilty of ‘hocha.’ Breaking such a little jar scarcely seemed to be sin. However, the Shipibos insisted that hocha was really sin, and they explained more fully the meaning of the word. It could be used of breaking a jar, but only if the jar belonged to someone else. Hocha was nothing more nor less than destroying the possessions of another, but the meaning did not stop with purely material possessions. In their belief God owns the world and all that is in it. Anyone who destroys the work and plan of God is guilty of hocha. Hence the murderer is of all men most guilty of hocha, for he has destroyed God’s most important possession in the world, namely, man. Any destructive and malevolent spirit is hocha, for it is antagonistic and harmful to God’s creation. Rather than being a feeble word for some accidental event, this word for sin turned out to be exceedingly rich in meaning and laid a foundation for the full presentation of the redemptive act of God.”

In Warao it is translated as “bad obojona.” Obojona is a term that “includes the concepts of consciousness, will, attitude, attention and a few other miscellaneous notions.” (Source: Henry Osborn in The Bible Translator 1969, p. 74ff. ). See other occurrences of Obojona in the Warao New Testament.

Martin Ehrensvärd, one of the translators for the Danish Bibelen 2020, comments on the translation of this term: “We would explain terms, such that e.g. sin often became ‘doing what God does not want’ or ‘breaking God’s law’, ‘letting God down’, ‘disrespecting God’, ‘doing evil’, ‘acting stupidly’, ‘becoming guilty’. Now why couldn’t we just use the word sin? Well, sin in contemporary Danish, outside of the church, is mostly used about things such as delicious but unhealthy foods. Exquisite cakes and chocolates are what a sin is today.” (Source: Ehrensvärd in HIPHIL Novum 8/2023, p. 81ff. )

See also sinner.

complete verse (Job 31:30)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Job 31:30:

  • Kupsabiny: “I have never accepted to fall into sin
    so as to think that I should curse those people who met with calamity.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
  • Newari: “nor have I, by giving a curse, ‘May he go to the dogs,’
    have I ever sinned.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
  • Hiligaynon: “I have- not -sinned by cursing them.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)

Translation commentary on Job 31:30

I have not let my mouth sin: Job’s denial in this verse refers to his enemy in verse 29. For the use of parentheses see verses 5 and 18. Mouth is literally “palate.” Job is saying in his denial that he did not even let his palate (the roof of the mouth) sin. As one of the speech organs, it is a more specific form of my mouth. Rowley thinks that “palate” suggests taste, and so Job never even had a taste of cursing his enemy. Good News Translation combines the two lines of this verse, dispenses with the image, and says, “I never sinned….” Bible en français courant has “I never even allowed myself the wrong….” New Jerusalem Bible substitutes “tongue” for “palate”: “I, who would not allow my tongue to sin….” These examples give models that are both poetic and nonpoetic. In some languages a part of the body cannot be said to sin; accordingly we may say, as in Good News Translation, “I never sinned.”

By asking for his life with a curse: life in the Hebrew is nefesh, which may mean “soul” or life. In 1 Kings 3.11 Solomon is rewarded for not demanding the nefesh of his enemies. A curse may be put on someone in order to kill him, and thus New Jerusalem Bible translates “or to lay his life under a curse,” New International Version “by invoking a curse against his life.” Other translators assume that God must be named as the one who operates the curse; for example, Bible en français courant “of cursing him by asking God for his death.” Good News Translation “I have never sinned by praying for their death” seems to dismiss the curse completely. Verse 30 may also be expressed “I never sinned by cursing his life” or “I never put a curse on his life and so did not sin.”

Quoted with permission from Reyburn, Wiliam. A Handbook on Job. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 1992. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .